Paper detail

Strict Half-Singleton Bound, Strict Direct Upper Bound for Linear Insertion-Deletion Codes and Optimal Codes

Insertion-deletion codes (insdel codes for short) are used for correcting synchronization errors in communications, and in other many interesting fields such as DNA storage, date analysis, race-track memory error correction and language processing, and have recently gained a lot of attention. To determine the insdel distances of linear codes is a very challenging problem. The half-Singleton bound on the insdel distances of linear codes due to Cheng-Guruswami-Haeupler-Li is a basic upper bound on the insertion-deletion error-correcting capabilities of linear codes. On the other hand the natural direct upper bound $d_I(\mathcal C) \leq 2d_H(\mathcal C)$ is valid for any insdel code. In this paper, for a linear insdel code $\mathcal C$ we propose a strict half-Singleton upper bound $d_I(\mathcal C) \leq 2(n-2k+1)$ if $\mathcal C$ does not contain the codeword with all 1s, and a stronger direct upper bound $d_I(\mathcal C) \leq 2(d_H(\mathcal C)-t)$ under a weak condition, where $t\geq 1$ is a positive integer determined by the generator matrix. We also give optimal linear insdel codes attaining our strict half-Singleton bound and direct upper bound, and show that the code length of optimal binary linear insdel codes with respect to the (strict) half-Singleton bound is about twice the dimension. Interestingly explicit optimal linear insdel codes attaining the (strict) half-Singleton bound, with the code length being independent of the finite field size, are given.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.