Paper detail

Stretching Semiflexible Polymer Chains: Evidence for the Importance of Excluded Volume Effects from Monte Carlo Simulation

Semiflexible macromolecules in dilute solution under very good solvent conditions are modeled by self-avoiding walks on the simple cubic lattice ($d=3$ dimensions) and square lattice ($d=2$ dimensions), varying chain stiffness by an energy penalty $ε_b$ for chain bending. In the absence of excluded volume interactions, the persistence length $\ell_p$ of the polymers would then simply be $\ell_p=\ell_b(2d-2)^{-1}q_b^{-1}$ with $q_b= \exp(-ε_b/k_BT)$, the bond length $\ell_b$ being the lattice spacing, and $k_BT$ is the thermal energy. Using Monte Carlo simulations applying the pruned-enriched Rosenbluth method (PERM), both $q_b$ and the chain length $N$ are varied over a wide range $(0.005 \leq q_b \leq 1, \; N \leq 50000$), and also a stretching force $f$ is applied to one chain end (fixing the other end at the origin). In the absence of this force, in $d=2$ a single crossover from rod-like behavior (for contour lengths less than $\ell_p$) to swollen coils occurs, invalidating the Kratky-Porod model, while in $d=3$ a double crossover occurs, from rods to Gaussian coils (as implied by the Kratky-Porod model) and then to coils that are swollen due to the excluded volume interaction. If the stretching force is applied, excluded volume interactions matter for the force versus extension relation irrespective of chain stiffness in $d=2$, while theories based on the Kratky-Porod model are found to work in $d=3$ for stiff chains in an intermediate regime of chain extensions. While for $q_b \ll 1$ in this model a persistence length can be estimated from the initial decay of bond-orientational correlations, it is argued that this is not possible for more complex wormlike chains (e.g. bottle-brush polymers). Consequences for the proper interpretation of experiments are briefly discussed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.