Paper detail

Stray light analysis of the Xinglong 2.16m telescope

An effort towards understanding of the stray light problems for the Xinglong 2.16-m telescope was presented to estimate the stray light performance of the telescope itself and provide a method for improving the stray light suppression. The stray light analysis for 2.16-m telescope model, which consists the onion shaped dome, telescope structure, equatorial mount and telescope optics, has been performed with two cases (1) point to 60° and (2) point to zenith, in both azimuth and elevation direction. The Point Source Normalized Irradiance Transmittance (PSNIT), which is generally used for assessing stray light and uncorrelated to entrance aperture, was calculated with a series of off-axis angles. It shows that the PSNIT values are less than 10-7 when off-axis angles are larger than 20°. The dominant contributors of stray light (primary and secondary mirror, telescope structure and dome) were identified to give advice for performance improvement. The analyses indicate that significant benefit can be realized with adding only 5 vanes inside the bottom portion of the secondary baffle. In the case of point to zenith, the PSNIT values will decrease about 40% at average.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.