Paper detail

Strangeness and charm in quark-gluon hadronization

This dissertation presents a theoretical study of soft hadron production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We explore the principles governing the hadronization of the expanding QGP fireball, and to understand its properties. Much of the ongoing effort is to demonstrate the validity of a QGP hadronization model which describes the particle production data accurately. We begin with a centrality study of multistrange hadrons from Au-Au collisions at 62.4 GeV at RHIC. We show that the statistical hadronization model (SHM) well describes particle production in QGP hadronization. For all centralities, the physical properties are compatible with the earlier proposed critical hadronization pressure suggesting universal hadronization conditions of QGP. Heavy-ion collisions at LHC present a new challenge for SHM in describing particle production at TeV energy scales. We show that the chemical non-equilibrium model gives a good description of the hadron production in Pb--Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV consistently as a function of centrality. Moreover, the model parameters assume expected values suggested by previous studies at lower energies. The quark-gluon plasma fireball hadronizes at the same universal hadronization conditions, that is a common critical pressure, entropy and energy density. At LHC energies, a significant amount of charm is expected to be produced and it is therefore crucial to incorporate charm into the present description of particle production. We present an upgraded SHARE with CHARM program, that quantifies the effect of charm on the yield of lighter hadrons and physical properties of the hadronizing fireball. In addition to light flavors ($u,d,s$), SHARE with CHARM describes charm hadron production and decays. We observe, that according to present experimental results, charm decays mainly affect the yields of multistrange particles.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.