Paper detail

Strain compatibility and gradient elasticity in morphing origami metamaterials

The principles of origami design have proven useful in a number of technological applications. Origami tessellations in particular constitute a class of morphing metamaterials with unusual geometric and elastic properties. Although inextensible in principle, fine creases allow origami metamaterials to effectively deform non-isometrically. Determining the strains that are compatible with coarse-grained origami kinematics as well as the corresponding elasticity functionals is paramount to understanding and controlling the morphing paths of origami metamaterials. Here, within a unified theory, we solve this problem for a wide array of well-known origami tessellations including the Miura-ori as well as its more formidable oblique, non-developable and non-flat-foldable variants. We find that these patterns exhibit two universal properties. On one hand, they all admit equal but opposite in-plane and out-of-plane Poisson's ratios. On the other hand, their bending energy detaches from their in-plane strain and depends instead on the strain gradient. The results are illustrated over a case study of the self-equilibrium geometry of origami pillars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.