Paper detail

Stops and MET: the shape of things to come

LHC experiments have placed strong bounds on the production of supersymmetric colored particles (squarks and gluinos), under the assumption that all flavors of squarks are nearly degenerate. However, the current experimental constraints on stop squarks are much weaker, due to the smaller production cross section and difficult backgrounds. While light stops are motivated by naturalness arguments, it has been suggested that such particles become nearly impossible to detect near the limit where their mass is degenerate with the sum of the masses of their decay products. We show that this is not the case, and that searches based on missing transverse energy (MET) have significant reach for stop masses above 175 GeV, even in the degenerate limit. We consider direct pair production of stops, decaying to invisible LSPs and tops with either hadronic or semi-leptonic final states. Modest intrinsic differences in MET are magnified by boosted kinematics and by shape analyses of MET or suitably-chosen observables related to MET. For these observables we show that the distributions of the relevant backgrounds and signals are well-described by simple analytic functions, in the kinematic regime where signal is enhanced. Shape analyses of MET-related distributions will allow the LHC experiments to place significantly improved bounds on stop squarks, even in scenarios where the stop-LSP mass difference is degenerate with the top mass. Assuming 20/fb of luminosity at 8 TeV, we conservatively estimate that experiments can exclude or discover degenerate stops with mass as large as ~ 360 GeV and 560 GeV for massless LSPs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.