Paper detail

Stochastization of BKL dynamics and Anisotropic Sky Patterns

The dynamics of cosmological billiards in $4=3+1$ spacetime dimensions is analyzed; the different statistical maps are characterized within the stochastic limit, reached after a large number of iterations of the billiard maps. New densities of invariant measures have been established, also for billiard systems which contain symmetry walls, according to the content of Weyl reflections in the maps, which account for the change of sign of the non-oscillating scale factors in the solution to the Einstein field equations. The statistical equivalence between the big billiard and the small billiard, posed in [Phys. Rev. D83, 044038 (2011)], is here proven by means of these new definitions of probabilities for the small billiard. Further new classes of BKL probabilities have also been defined especially for the one-variable map and for the two-variable map, for the early-time BKL dynamics, for a stochastizing BKL dynamics and for a completely stochastized dynamics, both for the big billiard and for the small billiard. The trajectories have been classified according to these new probabilties, and different specifications of probabilties comparing classes of initial conditions have been assigned for the stochastization of the dynamics. As a result, is is possible to establish a definition of BKL probabilities for the unquotiented dynamics of the big billiard, where the different patterns of Weyl reflections are encoded. The statistical description of BKL probabilities for the occurrence of a given number of epochs in each era are therefore further characterized by the most probable number of Weyl reflections contained in such eras, which is inferred from the implications of the billiard maps on the UPHP. These new constructions have been considered for the determination of the connection between the observed values of anisotropy by a stochastic limit of the BKL dynamics.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.