Paper detail

Stochastic star formation activity of galaxies within the first billion years probed by JWST

In this work, we aim at characterizing the burstiness level of high-redshift galaxy SFHs and its evolution. We implement a stochastic SFH in CIGALE using PSD, to estimate the burstiness level of star formation in galaxies at 6<z<12. We find that SFHs with a high level of stochasticity better reproduce the SEDs of z>6 galaxies, while smoother assumptions introduce biases when applied to galaxies with bursty star-formation activity. The assumed stochasticity level of the SFH also affects the constraints on galaxies' physical properties, including the main sequence. Successively assuming different levels of burstiness, we determined the best-suited SFH for each 6<z<12 galaxy in the JADES sample from a Bayes Factor analysis. Galaxies are classified according to their level of burstiness, and the corresponding physical properties are associated to them. For massive galaxies (8.8< logM*/Msun<9.5), the fraction of bursty galaxies increases from 0.38+/-0.08 to 0.77+/-0.2 at z~6 and z~12, respectively. At all redshifts, only <20% of low-mass galaxies are classified as bursty; although, this estimate is uncertain because their faintness leads to a low S/N. For bursty galaxies, the log10(SFR10/SFR100) ratio, another indicator of bursty star formation, does not evolve with redshift, but the fraction of galaxies with a high log10(SFR10/SFR100) slightly increases from 0.28+/-0.06 to 0.38+/-0.11 between z~6 and z~9. We include additional constraints from observations on sigmaUV, the dispersion of the UV magnitude distribution, and SFE, finding a maximum of 0.72+/-0.02 mag and 0.06+/-0.01 for sigmaUV and SFE, respectively. This confirms that neither alone is responsible for the weak evolution of the UVLF at z>10. Our results add further evidence that a combination with other mechanisms is likely responsible for the high-z UVLF. The stochastic SFH module is public as part of CIGALE version 2025.1.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.