Paper detail

Stochastic Processes as the Origin of the Double-Power Law Shape of the Quasar Luminosity Function

The Quasar Luminosity Function (QLF) offers insight into the early co-evolution of black holes and galaxies. It has been characterized observationally up to redshift $z\sim6$ with clear evidence of a double power-law shape, in contrast to the Schechter-like form of the underlying dark-matter halo mass function. We investigate a physical origin for the difference in these distributions by considering the impact of stochasticity induced by the processes that determine the quasar luminosity for a given host halo and redshift. We employ a conditional luminosity function and construct the relation between median quasar magnitude versus halo mass $M_{UV,\rm{c}}(M_{\rm{h}})$ with log-normal in luminosity scatter $Σ$, and duty-cycle $ε_{\rm{DC}}$, and focus on high redshift $z\gtrsim4$. We show that, in order to reproduce the observed QLF, the $Σ=0$ abundance matching requires all of the brightest quasars to be hosted in the rarest most massive dark-matter halos (with an increasing $M_{UV,\rm{c}}/M_{\rm{h}}$ in halo mass). Conversely, for $Σ>0$ the brightest quasars can be over-luminous outliers hosted in relatively common dark-matter halos. In this case, the median quasar magnitude versus halo mass relation, $M_{UV,\rm{c}}$, flattens at the high-end, as expected in self-regulated growth due to feedback. We sample the parameter space of $Σ$ and $ε_{\rm{DC}}$ and show that $M_{UV,\rm{c}}$ flattens above $M_{\rm{h}}\sim 10^{12}M_{\odot}$ for $ε_{\rm{DC}}<10^{-2}$. Models with $ε_{\rm{DC}}\sim1$ instead require a high mass threshold close to $M_{\rm{h}}\gtrsim10^{13}M_{\odot}$. We investigate the impact of $ε_{\rm{DC}}$ and $Σ$ on measurements of clustering and find there is no luminosity dependence on clustering for $Σ>0.3$, consistent with recent observations from Subaru HSC.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.