Paper detail

Stochastic Modeling of an Infectious Disease Part II: Simulation Experiments and Verification of the Analysis

In Part 1, we introduced a stochastic model of an infectious disease, based on the BDI (birth and death with immigration) process. We showed that random processes defined by this model can capture the essence of the stochastic, often erratic, behavior of the infection process. The most significant finding was that it is negative binomial distributed with small r, hence it is geometrically distributed with an exceedingly long tail. This leads to a much larger disparity in the epidemic patterns than has been known to the modeling community. In Part 2 we conduct simulation experiments by implementing an event-driven simulator. Several independent runs are presented to verify the findings reported in Part 1. The enormous variations among the sample paths obtained from several consecutive and independent runs with statistically identical conditions confirm our analysis. Note that the epidemic pattern that we observe is merely one sample path taken out of infinitely many paths. Thus, one such path cannot represent the ensemble of the underlying random process. By plotting the simulation runs in the semi-log scale, we can see that the probabilistic chances in the early phase of the infection process determine the behavior of the process. Once the process has reached a considerable number, the weak law of large numbers sets in, and the process behaves less erratically than in the early phase. One important implication of our findings is that it would be a futile effort to attempt to identify all plausible causes of the epidemic patterns. Mere luck may play a more significant role than most people believe. It would be worth remarking that the BDI process might be applicable to explain the disparity in wealth among individuals of similar earning power, expenditure, and investment portfolio.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.