Paper detail

Stochastic gravitational-wave background searches and constraints on neutron-star ellipticity

Rotating neutron stars (NSs) are promising sources of gravitational waves (GWs) in the frequency band of ground-based detectors. They are expected to emit quasi-monochromatic, long-duration GW signals, called continuous waves (CWs), due to their deviations from spherical symmetry. The degree of such deformations, and hence the information about the internal structure of a NS, is encoded in a dimensionless parameter $\varepsilon$ called ellipticity. Searches for CW signals from isolated Galactic NSs have shown to be sensitive to ellipticities as low as $\varepsilon \sim \mathcal{O}(10^{-9})$. These searches are optimal for detecting and characterising GWs from individual NSs, but they are not designed to measure the properties of NSs as population, such as the average ellipticity $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{av}}$. These ensemble properties can be determined by the measurement of the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) arising from the superposition of GW signals from individually-undetectable NSs. In this work, we perform a cross-correlation search for such a SGWB using the data from the first three observation runs of Advanced LIGO and Virgo. Finding no evidence for a SGWB signal, we set upper limits on the dimensionless energy density parameter $Ω_{\mathrm{gw}}(f)$. Using these results, we also constrain the average ellipticity of Galactic NSs and five NS ``hotspots'', as a function of the number of NSs emitting GWs within the frequency band of the search $N_{\mathrm{band}}$. We find $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{av}} \lesssim 1.8 \times 10^{-8}$, with $N_{\mathrm{band}}=1.6 \times 10^7$, for Galactic NSs, and $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{av}} \lesssim [3.5-11.8]\times 10^{-7}$, with $N_{\mathrm{band}}=1.6 \times 10^{10}$, for NS hotspots.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.