Paper detail

Stochastic Electron Acceleration by Temperature Anisotropy Instabilities Under Solar Flare Plasma Conditions

Using 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) plasma simulations we study electron acceleration by temperature anisotropy instabilities, assuming conditions typical of above-the-loop-top (ALT) sources in solar flares. We focus on the long-term effect of $T_{e,\perp} > T_{e,\parallel}$ instabilities by driving the anisotropy growth during the entire simulation time, through imposing a shearing or a compressing plasma velocity ($T_{e,\perp}$ and $T_{e,\parallel}$ are the temperatures perpendicular and parallel to the magnetic field). This magnetic growth makes $T_{e,\perp}/T_{e,\parallel}$ grow due to electron magnetic moment conservation, and amplifies the ratio $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}$ from $\sim 0.53$ to $\sim 2$ ($ω_{ce}$ and $ω_{pe}$ are the electron cyclotron and plasma frequencies, respectively). In the regime $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}\lesssim 1.2-1.7$ the instability is dominated by oblique, quasi-electrostatic (OQES) modes, and the acceleration is inefficient. When $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}$ has grown to $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}\gtrsim 1.2-1.7$, electrons are efficiently accelerated by the inelastic scattering provided by unstable parallel, electromagnetic z (PEMZ) modes. After $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}$ reaches $\sim 2$, the electron energy spectra show nonthermal tails that differ between the shearing and compressing cases. In the shearing case, the tail resembles a power-law of index $α_s \sim$ 2.9 plus a high-energy bump reaching $\sim 300$ keV. In the compressing runs, $α_s \sim$ 3.7 with a spectral break above $\sim 500$ keV. This difference can be explained by the different temperature evolutions in these two types of simulations, suggesting a critical role played by the type of anisotropy driving, $ω_{ce}/ω_{pe}$ and the electron temperature in the efficiency of the acceleration.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.