Stochastic diagonal estimation: probabilistic bounds and an improved algorithm

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study the problem of estimating the diagonal of an implicitly given matrix AA. For such a matrix we have access to an oracle that allows us to evaluate the matrix vector product AvAv. For random variable vv drawn from an appropriate distribution, this may be used to return an estimate of the diagonal of the matrix AA. Whilst results exist for probabilistic guarantees relating to the error of estimates of the trace of AA, no such results have yet been derived for the diagonal. We analyse the number of queries ss required to guarantee that with probability at least 1−δ1-δ the estimates of the relative error of the diagonal entries is at most ε\varepsilon. We extend this analysis to the 2-norm of the difference between the estimate and the diagonal of AA. We prove, discuss and experiment with bounds on the number of queries ss required to guarantee a probabilistic bound on the estimates of the diagonal by employing Rademacher and Gaussian random variables. Two sufficient upper bounds on the minimum number of query vectors are proved, extending the work of Avron and Toledo [JACM 58(2)8, 2011], and later work of Roosta-Khorasani and Ascher [FoCM 15, 1187-1212, 2015]. We find that, generally, there is little difference between the two, with convergence going as O(log⁡(1/δ)/ε2)O(\log(1/δ)/\varepsilon^2) for individual diagonal elements. However for small ss, we find that the Rademacher estimator is superior. These results allow us to then extend the ideas of Meyer, Musco, Musco and Woodruff [SOSA, 142-155, 2021], suggesting algorithm Diag++, to speed up the convergence of diagonal estimation from O(1/ε2)O(1/\varepsilon^2) to O(1/ε)O(1/\varepsilon) and make it robust to the spectrum of any positive semi-definite matrix AA.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.