Paper detail

Stochastic anomaly and large Reynolds number limit in hydrodynamic turbulence models

In this work we address the open problem of high Reynolds number limit in hydrodynamic turbulence, which we modify by considering a vanishing random (instead of deterministic) viscosity. In this formulation, a small-scale noise propagates to large scales in an inverse cascade, which can be described using qualitative arguments of the Kolmogorov-Obukhov theory. We conjecture that the limit of the resulting probability distribution exists as $\mathrm{Re} \to \infty$, and the limiting flow at finite time remains stochastic even if forcing, initial and boundary conditions are deterministic. This conjecture is confirmed numerically for the Sabra model of turbulence, where the solution is deterministic before and random immediately after a blowup. Then, we derive a purely inviscid problem formulation with a stochastic boundary condition imposed in the inertial interval.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.