Paper detail

Stochastic accretion of the Earth

Earth is depleted in volatile elements relative to chondritic meteorites, its possible building blocks. The extent of this depletion increases with decreasing condensation temperature, and is approximated by a cumulative normal distribution, unlike that in any chondrite. However, moderately volatile elements, occupying the mid-range of the distribution, have chondritic isotope ratios, contrary to that expected from loss by partial vaporisation/condensation. Here we reconcile these observations by showing, using N-body simulations, that Earth accreted stochastically from many precursor bodies whose variable compositions reflect the temperatures at which they formed. Impact-induced atmospheric loss was efficient only when the proto-Earth was small, and elements that accreted thereafter retain near-chondritic isotope ratios. Earth's composition is reproduced when initial temperatures of planetesimal- to embryo-sized bodies are set by disk accretion rates of (1.08 $\pm$ 0.17) $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ solar masses/yr, although they may be perturbed by $^{26}$Al heating on bodies formed at different times. The model implies a heliocentric gradient in composition and rapid planetesimal formation within $\sim$ 1 Myr, in accord with radiometric volatile depletion ages of Earth.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.