Paper detail

Stieltjes continued fractions related to the Paperfolding sequence and Rudin-Shapiro sequence

We investigate two Stieltjes continued fractions given by the paperfolding sequence and the Rudin-Shapiro sequence. By explicitly describing certain subsequences of the convergents $P_n(x)/Q_n(x)$ modulo $4$, we give the formal power series expansions (modulo $4$) of these two continued fractions and prove that they are congruent modulo $4$ to algebraic series in $\mathbb{Z}[[x]]$. Therefore, the coefficient sequences of the formal power series expansions are $2$-automatic. Write $Q_{n}(x)=\sum_{i\ge 0}a_{n,i}x^{i}$. Then $(Q_{n}(x))_{n\ge 0}$ defines a two-dimensional coefficient sequence $(a_{n,i})_{n,i\ge 0}$. We prove that the coefficient sequences $(a_{n,i}\mod 4)_{n\ge 0}$ introduced by both $(Q_{n}(x))_{n\ge 0}$ and $(P_{n}(x))_{n\ge 0}$ are $2$-automatic for all $i\ge 0$. Moreover, the pictures of these two dimensional coefficient sequences modulo $4$ present a kind of self-similar phenomenon.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.