Paper detail

STEREO Direct Imaging of a CME-driven Shock to 0.5AU

Fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) generate standing or bow shocks as they propagate through the corona and solar wind. Although CME shocks have previously been detected indirectly via their emission at radio frequencies, direct imaging has remained elusive due to their low contrast at optical wavelengths. Here we report the first images of a CME-driven shock as it propagates through interplanetary space from 8R_Sun to 120R_Sun (0.5AU), using observations from the STEREO Heliospheric Imager (HI). The CME was measured to have a velocity of ~1000 km/s and a Mach number of 4.1\pm1.2, while the shock front stand-off distance (Delta) was found to increase linearly to ~20 R_Sun at 0.5 AU. The normalised standoff distance (Delta/DO) showed reasonable agreement with semi-empirical relations, where D_O is the CME radius. However, when normalised using the radius of curvature, Delta/R_O did not agree well with theory, implying that R_O was under-estimated by a factor of ~3-8. This is most likely due to the difficulty in estimating the larger radius of curvature along the CME axis from the observations, which provide only a cross-sectional view of the CME.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.