Paper detail

Steps towards a classification of $C^r$-generic dynamics close to homoclinic points

We present here the first part of a program for a classification of the generic dynamics close to homoclinic and heteroclinic points, in the $C^r$ topologies, $r\geq 1$. This paper only contains announcements and a few sketches of proofs; a forthcoming series of papers will present the proofs in details. The two prototypical examples of non-hyperbolic dynamics are homoclinic tangencies and heterodimensional cycles. Palis conjectured that they actually characterize densely non-hyperbolic dynamics. It is therefore important to understand what happens close to those bifurcations. We generalize classical results of Newhouse, Palis and Viana, for both tangencies and cycles: close to a homoclinic tangency or to a heterodimensional cycle there is abundance of diffeomorphisms exhibiting infinitely many sinks or sources if and only if the dynamics is not volume-hyperbolic. This proves in particular a conjecture of Turaev for homoclinic tangencies. An important result of Bonatti, Diaz, Pujals states that if a homoclinic class is $C^1$-robustly without dominated splitting, then nearby diffeomorphisms exhibit $C^1$-generically infinitely many sinks or sources. We show that this holds in higher regularities, under the further assumption that non-dominations are obtained through so-called "mechanisms". This includes all the examples of robustly non-dominated homoclinic classes one can build with the tools known up to now. We actually have a $C^r$-equivalent of a recent $C^1$-result of Bochi and Bonatti: we describe precisely the Lyapunov exponents along periodic points that may appear close to a homoclinic tangency or to a homoclinic class. The results of Newhouse, Palis and Viana were proven for the $C^r$ topologies, $r\geq 2$. Our results hold also in the $C^{1+α}$ topologies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.