Paper detail

Step Size is a Consequential Parameter in Continuous Cellular Automata

Step size in continuous cellular automata (CA) plays an important role in the stability and behavior of self-organizing patterns. Continous CA dynamics are defined by formula very similar to numerical estimation of physics-based ordinary differential equations, specifically Euler's method, for which a large step size is often inaccurate and unstable. Rather than asymptotically approaching more accurate estimates of CA dynamics with decreasing step size, continuous CA may support different self-organizing patterns at different ranges of step size. We discuss several examples of mobile patterns that become unstable at step sizes that are too small as well as too large. Additionally, an individual mobile pattern may exhibit qualitatively different behavior across a range of step sizes. We demonstrate examples of the effects of step size in pattern stability and qualitative behavior in continuous CA implemented in the Lenia framework and its variant, Glaberish.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.