Paper detail

Stellar triples on the edge; Comprehensive overview of the evolution of destabilised triples leading to stellar and binary exotica

Hierarchical triple stars are ideal laboratories for studying the interplay between orbital dynamics and stellar evolution. Both stellar wind mass loss and three-body dynamics cooperate to destabilise triples, which can lead to a variety of astrophysical exotica. So far our understanding of their evolution was mainly built upon results from extensive binary-single scattering experiments. Starting from generic initial conditions, we evolve an extensive set of hierarchical triples using a combination of the triple evolution code TRES and an N-body code. We find that the majority of triples preserve their hierarchy throughout their evolution, which is in contradiction with the commonly adopted picture that unstable triples always experience a chaotic, democratic resonant interaction. The duration of the unstable phase is much longer than expected, so that stellar evolution cannot be neglected. Typically an unstable triple dissolve into a single star and a binary; sometimes democratically (the initial hierarchy is lost and the lightest body usually escapes), but also in a hierarchical way (the tertiary is ejected in a slingshot, independent of its mass). Collisions are common, and mostly involve the two original inner binary components still on the main-sequence. This contradicts the idea that collisions with a giant during democratic encounters dominate. Together with collisions in stable triples, we find that triple evolution is the dominant mechanism for stellar collisions in the Milky Way. Furthermore, our simulations produce runaway and walk-away stars with speeds up to several tens km/s, with a maximum of a few 100km/s. We suggest that destabilised triples can alleviate the tension behind the origin of the observed run-away stars. Lastly, we present a promising indicator to make general predictions for the fate of a specific triple, based on the initial inclination of the system.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.