Paper detail

Stellar Tidal Disruption Events with Abundances and Realistic Structures (STARS): Library of Fallback Rates

We present the STARS library, a grid of tidal disruption event (TDE) simulations interpolated to provide the mass fallback rate ($dM/dt$) to the black hole for a main-sequence star of any stellar mass, stellar age, and impact parameter. We use a one-dimensional stellar evolution code to construct stars with accurate stellar structures and chemical abundances, then perform tidal disruption simulations in a three-dimensional adaptive-mesh hydrodynamics code with a Helmholtz equation of state, in unprecedented resolution: from 131 to 524 cells across the diameter of the star. The interpolated library of fallback rates is available on GitHub (https://github.com/jamielaw-smith/STARS_library) and version 1.0.0 is archived on Zenodo; one can query the library for any stellar mass, stellar age, and impact parameter. We provide new fitting formulae for important disruption quantities ($β_{\rm crit}, ΔM, \dot M_{\rm peak}, t_{\rm peak}, n_\infty$) as a function of stellar mass, stellar age, and impact parameter. Each of these quantities vary significantly with stellar mass and stellar age, but we are able to reduce all of our simulations to a single relationship that depends only on stellar structure, characterized by a single parameter $ρ_c/\barρ$, and impact parameter $β$. We also find that, in general, more centrally concentrated stars have steeper $dM/dt$ rise slopes and shallower decay slopes. For the same $ΔM$, the $dM/dt$ shape varies significantly with stellar mass, promising the potential determination of stellar properties from the TDE light curve alone. The $dM/dt$ shape depends strongly on stellar structure and to a certain extent stellar mass, meaning that fitting TDEs using this library offers a better opportunity to determine the nature of the disrupted star and the black hole.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.