Paper detail

Stellar sources of dust in the high redshift Universe

With the aim of investigating whether stellar sources can account for the >10^8 Msun dust masses inferred from mm/sub-mm observations of samples of 5<z<6.4 quasars,we develop a chemical evolution model which follows the evolution of metals and dust on the stellar characteristic lifetimes, taking into account dust destruction mechanisms.Using a grid of stellar dust yields as a function of the initial mass and metallicity over the range 1-40 Msun and 0-1 Zsun,we show that the role of AGB stars in cosmic dust evolution at high redshift might have been over-looked.We apply the chemical evolution model with dust to the host galaxy of the most distant quasar at z=6.4, SDSS J1148+5251.Given the current uncertainties on the star formation history of the host galaxy, we have considered two models: (i) a star formation history obtained in a numerical simulation by Li et al.(2007) which predicts that a large stellar bulge is already formed at z=6.4,and (ii) a constant star formation rate of 1000 Msun/yr, as suggested by the observations if most of the FIR luminosity is due to young stars.The total mass of dust predicted at z=6.4 by the first model is 2x10^8Msun,within the range of values inferred by observations,with a substantial contribution (80%) of AGB-dust.When a constant star formation rate is adopted,the contribution of AGB-dust decreases to 50% but the total mass of dust formed is a factor 2 smaller.Both models predict a rapid enrichment of the ISM with metals and a relatively mild evolution of the carbon abundance,in agreement with observational constraints. This supports the idea that stellar sources can account for the dust observed but show that the contribution of AGB stars to dust production cannot be neglected, even at the most extreme redshifts currently accessible to observations.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.