Paper detail

Stellar signal components seen in HARPS and HARPS-N solar radial velocities

Context. Radial velocity (RV) measurements induced by the presence of planets around late-type stars are contaminated by stellar signals that are of the order of a few meters per second in amplitude, even for the quietest stars. Those signals are induced by acoustic oscillations, convective granulation patterns, active regions co-rotating with the stellar surface, and magnetic activity cycles. Aims. This study investigates the properties of all coherent stellar signals seen on the Sun on timescales up to its sidereal rotational period. By combining HARPS and HARPS-N solar data spanning several years, we are able to clearly resolve signals on timescales from minutes to several months. Methods. We use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) mixture model to determine the quality of the solar data based on the expected airmass-magnitude extinction law. We then fit the velocity power spectrum of the cleaned and heliocentric RVs with all known variability sources, to recreate the RV contribution of each component. Results. After rejecting variations caused by poor weather conditions, we are able to improve the average intra-day root mean square (RMS) value by a factor of ~1.8. On sub-rotational timescales, we are able to fully recreate the observed RMS of the RV variations. In order to also include rotational components and their strong alias peaks introduced by nightly sampling gaps, the alias powers are accounted for by being redistributed to the central frequencies of the rotational harmonics. Conclusions. In order to enable a better understanding and mitigation of stellar activity sources, their respective impact on the total RV must be well-measured and characterized. We are able to recreate RV components up to rotational timescales, which can be further used to analyse the impact of each individual source of stellar signals on the detectability of exoplanets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.