Paper detail

Stellar Revival and Repeated Flares in Deeply Plunging Tidal Disruption Events

Tidal disruption events with tidal radius $r_{\rm t}$ and pericenter distance $r_{\rm p}$ are characterized by the quantity $β= r_{\rm t}/r_{\rm p}$, and "deep encounters" have $β\gg 1$. It has been assumed that there is a critical $β\equiv β_{\rm c} \sim 1$ that differentiates between partial and full disruption: for $β< β_{\rm c}$ a fraction of the star survives the tidal interaction with the black hole, while for $β> β_{\rm c}$ the star is completely destroyed, and hence all deep encounters should be full. Here we show that this assumption is incorrect by providing an example of a $β= 16$ encounter between a $γ= 5/3$, solar-like polytrope and a $10^6 M_{\odot}$ black hole -- for which previous investigations have found $β_{\rm c} \simeq 0.9$ -- that results in the reformation of a stellar core post-disruption that comprises approximately 25\% of the original stellar mass. We propose that the core reforms under self-gravity, which remains important because of the compression of the gas both near pericenter, where the compression occurs out of the orbital plane, and substantially after pericenter, where compression is within the plane. We find that the core forms on a bound orbit about the black hole, and we discuss the corresponding implications of our findings in the context of recently observed, repeating nuclear transients.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.