Paper detail

Stellar Populations and Kinematics of Red Galaxies at z>2: Implications for the Formation of Massive Galaxies

We recently identified a substantial population of galaxies at z>2 with red rest-frame optical colors. These distant red galaxies (DRGs) are efficiently selected by the simple observed color criterion J-K>2.3. In this paper we present NIR spectroscopy with Keck/NIRSPEC of six DRGs at 2.4<z<3.2. We detect continuum emission and emission lines of all observed galaxies. Equivalent widths of H alpha are 20-30 Ang, smaller than measured for LBGs and nearby LIRGs, and comparable to normal nearby galaxies. The modest equivalent widths imply that the galaxies either have a decreasing star formation rate, or that they are very dusty. Fitting both the photometry and the H alpha lines, we find continuum extinction A_V=1-2 mag, ages 1-2.5 Gyr, star formation rates 200-400 solar masses/yr, and stellar masses 1-5x10^11 solar masses for models with constant star formation rates. From [NII]/H alpha ratios we infer that the metallicities are high, 1-1.5 x Solar. For four galaxies we can determine line widths from the optical emission lines. The widths are high, ranging from 130-240 km/s, and by combining data for LBGs and DRGs we find significant correlations between linewidth and restframe U-V color, and between linewidth and stellar mass. The latter correlation has a similar slope and offset as the ``baryonic Tully-Fisher relation'' for nearby galaxies. The median dynamical mass is ~2x10^11 solar masses, supporting the high stellar masses inferred from the photometry. We find that the median M/L_V ~ 0.8, a factor of ~5 higher than measured for LBGs. We infer from our small sample that DRGs are dustier, more metal rich, more massive, and have higher ages than z=3 LBGs of the same rest-frame V-band luminosity. Their high M/L ratios imply that they contribute significantly to the stellar mass density at z~2.5. [ABRIDGED]

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access16 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.