Paper detail

Stellar populations and evolution of early-type cluster galaxies: Constraints from optical imaging and spectroscopy of z=0.5-0.9 galaxy clusters

We present an analysis of stellar populations and evolutionary history of galaxies in three similarly rich galaxy clusters MS0451.6-0305 (z=0.54), RXJ0152.7-1357 (z=0.83), and RXJ1226.9+3332 (z=0.89); based on high S/N ground-based optical spectroscopy and HST imaging for 17-34 members in each cluster. We find no indication of evolution of sizes or velocity dispersions with redshift at a given dynamical galaxy mass. We establish the Fundamental Plane (FP) and scaling relations between absorption line indices and velocity dispersions. We confirm the steeper FP at z=0.86 compared to the low redshift FP, indicating (under the assumption of passive evolution) the formation redshift, z_form, depends on the galaxy velocity dispersion (or mass). z_form varies from z_form=1.24+-0.05 at velocity dispersion of 125 km/s to 1.95+-0.25 at 225 km/s. The three clusters and the low redshift sample follow similar scaling relations between absorption line indices and velocity dispersions. The strength of the higher order Balmer lines Hdelta and Hgamma implies z_form>2.8. From the line strengths we find that [M/H] for MS0451.6-0305 is about 0.2 dex below that of the other clusters, and confirm our previous result that [alpha/Fe] for RXJ0152.7-1357 is about 0.3 dex higher than that of the other clusters. These differences between the high-redshift clusters and the low redshift sample are inconsistent with a passive evolution scenario for early-type cluster galaxies over the redshift interval studied. (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.