Paper detail

STELLAR POPULATION GRADIENTS IN BRIGHT CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z=0.2

Slit spectra, covering the rest frame near-ultraviolet and blue wavelength regions, are combined with moderately deep g and R images to investigate radial population gradients in the brightest components of six z=0.2 galaxy clusters selected by x-ray brightness. We conclude that the brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) of the EMSS0440+02, EMSS0906+11 and EMSS1231+15 clusters have global stellar contents resembling nearby elliptical galaxies. The BCGs in the clusters EMSS0839+29, EMSS1455+22 and Abell2390 are complicated by ionized gas, which is detected over large portions of all three systems. Radial color variations are detected in the majority of galaxies and, for those systems not showing extended [OII] emission, the weakening of D4000 (which measures the 4000 Angstrom break in magnitudes) with radius falls in the upper range of what is seen among nearby ellipticals. However, there is no correlation between local D4000 values and (g-r), suggesting that these quantities are sensitive to different parameters. We estimate the metallicity sensitivity of D4000 using a combination of observational and theoretical data, and find metallicity gradients for BCGs which are relatively steep, and in qualitative agreement with predictions for galaxies which experience a single monolithic dissipative collapse. Line gradients measured with respect to g surface brightness show excellent galaxy-to-galaxy consistency, and are in good agreement with what has been measured in Coma cluster galaxies. The presence of significant stellar population gradients in the BCGs suggests that the material from which they formed experienced dissipation during the collapse phases, and it seems likely that these galaxies could not have formed solely from the merging of gas-poor galaxies.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.