Paper detail

Stellar mass-to-light ratios and the Tully-Fisher relation

We have used a suite of simplified spectrophotometric spiral galaxy evolution models to argue that there are substantial variations in stellar mass-to-light ratios (M/Ls) within and among galaxies, amounting to factors of between 3 and 7 in the optical, and factors of 2 in the near-infrared. Under the assumption of a universal spiral galaxy IMF, our models show a strong and robust correlation between stellar M/L and the optical colors of the integrated stellar populations. Using observed maximum disk M/Ls we conclude that a Salpeter Initial Mass Function (IMF) has too many low-mass stars per unit luminosity, but that an IMF similar to the Salpeter IMF at the high-mass end with less low-mass stars (giving stellar M/Ls 30% or more lower than the Salpeter value) is consistent with the maximum disk constraints. We apply the model trends in stellar M/L with color to the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation. We find that the stellar mass TF relation is relatively steep and has modest scatter, and is independent of the passband and color used to derive the stellar masses. The difference in slope between the optical (especially blue) and near-infrared TF relations is due to the combined effects of dust attenuation and stellar M/L variations with galaxy mass. We find that the baryonic TF relation has a slope of 3.5 (with random and systematic errors of +/- 0.2 each). Since we have normalized the stellar M/L to be as high as can possibly be allowed by maximum disk constraints, the slope of the baryonic TF relation will be somewhat shallower than 3.5 if all disks are substantially sub-maximal. [Abridged]

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.