Paper detail

Stellar Mass and Velocity Functions of Galaxies: Backward evolution and the fate of Milky Way siblings

We attempt in this paper to check the consistency of the observed Stellar Mass Function (SMF), SFR functions and the cosmic star formation rate density with simple backward evolutionary models. Starting from observed SMF for star-forming galaxies, we use backwards models to predict the evolution of a number of quantities, such as the SFR function, the cosmic SFR density and the Velocity Function. The velocity being a parameter attached to a galaxy during its history (contrary to the stellar mass), this approach allows us to quantify the number density evolution of galaxies of a given velocity, e.g. of the Milky Way siblings. Observations suggest that the SMF of star forming galaxies is constant between redshift 0 and 1. In order to reproduce this result, we must quench star formation in a number of star forming galaxies. The SMF of these quenched galaxies is consistent with available data concerning the increase in the population of quiescent galaxies in the same redshift interval. The SMF of quiescent galaxies is then mainly determined by the distribution of active galaxies that must stop star formation, with a modest mass redistribution during mergers. The cosmic SFR density, and the evolution of the SFR functions are relatively well recovered, although they provide some clue for a small evolution of the SMF of star forming galaxies at the lowest redshifts. We thus consider that we have obtained in a simple way a relatively consistent picture of the evolution of galaxies at intermediate redshifts. We note that if this picture is correct, 50 percent of the Milky-Way sisters (galaxies with the same velocity as our Galaxy, i.e. 220 km/s) have quenched their star formation since redshift 1 (and an even larger fraction for larger velocities). We discuss the processes that might be responsible for this transformation.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.