Paper detail

Stellar kinematics of X-ray bright massive elliptical galaxies

We discuss a simple and fast method for estimating masses of early-type galaxies from optical data and compare the results with X-ray derived masses. The optical method relies only on the most basic observables such as the surface brightness $I(R)$ and the line-of-sight velocity dispersion $σ_p(R)$ profiles and provides an anisotropy-independent estimate of the galaxy circular speed $V_c$. The mass-anisotropy degeneracy is effectively overcome by evaluating $V_c$ at a characteristic radius $R_{\rm sweet}$ defined from {\it local} properties of observed profiles. The sweet radius $R_{\rm sweet}$ is expected to lie close to $R_2$, where $I(R) \propto R^{-2}$, and not far from the effective radius $R_{\rm eff}$. We apply the method to a sample of five X-ray bright elliptical galaxies observed with the 6-m telescope BTA-6 in Russia. We then compare the optical $V_c$-estimate with the X-ray derived value, and discuss possible constraints on the non-thermal pressure in the hot gas and configuration of stellar orbits. We find that the average ratio of the optical $V_c$-estimate to the X-ray one is equal to $\approx 0.98$ with $11 \%$ scatter, i.e. there is no evidence for the large non-thermal pressure contribution in the gas at $\sim R_{\rm sweet}$. From analysis of the Lick indices H$β$, Mgb, Fe5270 and Fe5335, we calculate the mass of the stellar component within the sweet radius. We conclude that a typical dark matter fraction inside $R_{\rm sweet}$ in the sample galaxies is $\sim 60\%$ for the Salpeter IMF and $\sim 75 \%$ for the Kroupa IMF.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.