Paper detail

Stellar Disruption and the Quasar Radio Dichotomy

The origin of the dichotomy of radio loudness among quasars can be explained using recent findings that the mass of the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) in extended radio-loud quasars is systematically a few times that of their counterparts in radio-quiet quasars. This sensitive dependence of radio jet ejection upon SMBH mass probably arises from the blockage of jets by the presence of substantial quantities of gas tidally stripped from stars by the central BH. This disruptive gas, however, will only be available around BHs with masses less than $M_c ~\gtrsim ~10^8\Msun$, for which the tidal disruption radius lies outside the SMBH's event horizon. Consequently, we find that AGN with $M_{BH} > M_c$ can successfully launch jets with a wide range of powers, thus producing radio-loud quasars. The great majority of jets launched by less massive BHs, however, will be truncated in the vicinity of the SMBH due to mass loading from this stellar debris. This scenario also can naturally explain the remarkable dearth of extended radio structures in quasars showing broad absorption line spectra.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.