Paper detail

Stellar Disks in Aquarius Dark Matter Haloes

We investigate the gravitational interactions between live stellar disks and their dark matter halos, using LCDM haloes similar in mass to that of the Milky Way taken from the Aquarius Project. We introduce the stellar disks by first allowing the haloes to respond to the influence of a growing rigid disk potential from z = 1.3 to z = 1.0. The rigid potential is then replaced with star particles which evolve self-consistently with the dark matter particles until z = 0.0. Regardless of the initial orientation of the disk, the inner parts of the haloes contract and change from prolate to oblate as the disk grows to its full size. When the disk normal is initially aligned with the major axis of the halo at z=1.3, the length of the major axis contracts and becomes the minor axis by z=1.0. Six out of the eight disks in our main set of simulations form bars, and five of the six bars experience a buckling instability that results in a sudden jump in the vertical stellar velocity dispersion and an accompanying drop in the m=2 Fourier amplitude of the disk surface density. The bars are not destroyed by the buckling but continue to grow until the present day. Bars are largely absent when the disk mass is reduced by a factor of two or more; the relative disk-to-halo mass is therefore a primary factor in bar formation and evolution. A subset of the disks is warped at the outskirts and contains prominent non-coplanar material with a ring-like structure. Many disks reorient by large angles between z=1 and z=0, following a coherent reorientation of their inner haloes. Larger reorientations produce more strongly warped disks, suggesting a tight link between the two phenomena. The origins of bars and warps appear independent: some disks with strong bars show no disturbances at the outskirts, while the disks with the weakest bars show severe warps.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.