Paper detail

Stellar coronal mass ejections II. Constraints from spectroscopic observations

Detections of stellar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are still rare. Observations of strong Balmer line asymmetries during flare events have been interpreted as being caused by CMEs. Here, we aim to estimate the maximum possible Balmer line fluxes expected from CMEs to infer their detectability in spectroscopic observations. Moreover, we use these results together with a model of intrinsic CME rates to infer the potentially observable CME rates for stars of different spectral types under various observing conditions, as well as the minimum required observing time to detect stellar CMEs in Balmer lines. We find that generally CME detection is favoured for mid- to late-type M dwarfs, as they require the lowest signal-to-noise ratio for CME detection, and the fraction of observable-to-intrinsic CMEs is largest. They may require, however, longer observing times than stars of earlier spectral types at the same activity level, as their predicted intrinsic CME rates are lower. CME detections are generally favoured for stars close to the saturation regime, because they are expected to have the highest intrinsic rates; the predicted minimum observing time to detect CMEs on just moderately active stars is already >100 h. By comparison with spectroscopic data sets including detections as well as non-detections of CMEs, we find that our modelled maximum observable CME rates are generally consistent with these observations on adopting parameters within the ranges determined by observations of solar and stellar prominences.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.