Paper detail

Stellar convective penetration: parameterized theory and dynamical simulations

Most stars host convection zones in which heat is transported directly by fluid motion, but the behavior of convective boundaries is not well understood. Here we present 3D numerical simulations which exhibit penetration zones: regions where the entire luminosity \emph{could} be carried by radiation, but where the temperature gradient is approximately adiabatic and convection is present. To parameterize this effect, we define the "penetration parameter" $\mathcal{P}$ which compares how far the radiative gradient deviates from the adiabatic gradient on either side of the Schwarzschild convective boundary. Following Roxburgh (1989) and Zahn (1991), we construct an energy-based theoretical model in which $\mathcal{P}$ controls the extent of penetration. We test this theory using 3D numerical simulations which employ a simplified Boussinesq model of stellar convection. The convection is driven by internal heating and we use a height-dependent radiative conductivity; this allows us to separately specify $\mathcal{P}$ and the stiffness $\mathcal{S}$ of the radiative-convective boundary. We find significant convective penetration in all simulations. Our simple theory describes the simulations well. Penetration zones can take thousands of overturn times to develop, so long simulations or accelerated evolutionary techniques are required. In stars, we expect $\mathcal{P} \approx 1$ and in this regime our results suggest that convection zones may extend beyond the Schwarzschild boundary by up to $\sim$20-30% of a mixing length. We present a MESA stellar model of the Sun which employs our parameterization of convective penetration as a proof of concept. We discuss prospects for extending these results to more realistic stellar contexts.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.