Paper detail

Stellar collisions in accreting protoclusters: a Monte Carlo dynamical study

We explore the behaviour of accreting protoclusters with a Monte Carlo dynamical code in order to evaluate the relative roles of accretion, two body relaxation and stellar collisions in the cluster evolution. We corroborate the suggestion of Clarke & Bonnell that the number of stellar collisions should scale as $N^{5/3} \dot M^{2/3}$ (independent of other cluster parameters, where N is the number of stars in the cluster and $\dot M$ the rate of mass accretion) and thus strengthen the argument that stellar collisions are more likely in populous (large N) clusters. We however find that the estimates of Clarke & Bonnell were pessimistic in the sense that we find that more than 99 % of the stellar collisions occur within the post-adiabatic regime as the cluster evolves towards core collapse, driven by a combination of accretion and two-body relaxation. We discuss how the inclusion of binaries may reduce the number of collisions through the reversal of core collapse but also note that it opens up another collisional channel involving the merger of stars within hard binaries; future Nbody simulations are however required in order to explore this issue.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.