Paper detail

Stellar and Black Hole Mass Densities as Empirical Tracers of Co-evolution Show Lock-step Growth since $z{\sim}3$

At redshifts beyond $z{\sim}1$ measuring the black hole galaxy relations proves to be a difficult task. The bright light of the AGN aggravates deconvolution of black hole and galaxy properties. On the other hand high redshift data on these relations is vital to understand in what ways galaxies and black holes co-evolve and in what ways they don't. In this work we use black hole (BHMDs) and stellar mass densities (SMDs) to constrain the possible co-evolution of black holes with their host galaxies since $z{\sim}5$. The BHMDs are calculated from quasar luminosity functions (QLF) using the Soltan argument, while we use integrals over stellar mass functions (SMFs) or the star formation rate density to obtain values for the stellar mass density. We find that both quantities grow in lock-step below redshifts of $z{\sim}3$ with a non-evolving BHMD to SMD ratio. A fit to the data assuming a power law relation between the BHMD and the SMD yields exponents around unity ($1.0{-}1.5$). Up to $z{\sim}5$ the BHMD to SMD ratio doesn't show a strong evolution given the larger uncertainty in the completeness of high-redshift datasets. Our results, always applying the same analysis technique, seem to be consistent across all adopted data sets.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.