Paper detail

Steady-state $\mathit{GI}/\mathit{GI}/\mathit{n}$ queue in the Halfin-Whitt regime

We consider the FCFS $\mathit{GI}/\mathit{GI}/n$ queue in the so-called Halfin-Whitt heavy traffic regime. We prove that under minor technical conditions the associated sequence of steady-state queue length distributions, normalized by $n^{1/2}$, is tight. We derive an upper bound on the large deviation exponent of the limiting steady-state queue length matching that conjectured by Gamarnik and Momcilovic [Adv. in Appl. Probab. 40 (2008) 548-577]. We also prove a matching lower bound when the arrival process is Poisson. Our main proof technique is the derivation of new and simple bounds for the FCFS $\mathit{GI}/\mathit{GI}/n$ queue. Our bounds are of a structural nature, hold for all $n$ and all times $t\geq0$, and have intuitive closed-form representations as the suprema of certain natural processes which converge weakly to Gaussian processes. We further illustrate the utility of this methodology by deriving the first nontrivial bounds for the weak limit process studied in [Ann. Appl. Probab. 19 (2009) 2211-2269].

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.