Paper detail

Steady state extensional rheology of a dilute suspension of spheres in a dilute polymer solution

We investigate the steady-state extensional rheology of a dilute suspension of spherical particles in a dilute polymer solution. For a particle-free polymeric fluid, in addition to the solvent viscosity, the extensional viscosity due to the polymers, $μ^\text{poly}$, contributes to the total non-dimensionalized extensional viscosity $1+μ^\text{poly}$. When a small volume fraction, $ϕ$, of spheres is added to a polymeric fluid, the stress is altered by the Einstein viscosity of 2.5$ϕ$ and two additional stress contributions: the interaction stresslet and the particle-induced polymer stress (PIPS). The net interaction stress is positive at lower Deborah numbers (product of extension rate and polymer relaxation time), $De\lesssim0.5$, and negative at large $De$. Relative to undisturbed flow, the presence of spheres in uniaxial extensional flow creates larger and smaller local stretching regions. Below the coil-stretch transition ($De<0.5$), the polymers far from the particles are in a coiled state, and a wake of stretched polymers forms downstream of the particle as they are stretched by the large stretching regions around the particle. This leads to a positive interaction stresslet (surface) and the PIPS (stretched wake). Beyond the coil-stretch transition, polymers far from the particle are highly stretched, but they collapse closer to the coiled state as they arrive at the low-stretching regions near the particle surface. Therefore, a negative PIPS results from the regions of collapsed polymers. When $De\gtrsim0.6$, the changes in extensional viscosity from the interaction stresslet and the PIPS are $ϕμ^\text{poly}$ and approximately -1.85$ϕμ^\text{poly}$, respectively. At large $De$, the polymer extensional viscosity, $μ^\text{poly}$, is large. Therefore, adding particles reduces the extensional viscosity of the suspension ($(2.5-0.85μ^\text{poly})ϕ<0$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.