Paper detail

Steady State Equilibrium Condition of $npe^{\pm}$ Gas and Its Application to Astrophysics

The steady equilibrium conditions for a mixed gas of neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons and radiation field (abbreviated as $npe^{\pm}$ gas) with/without external neutrino flux are investigated, and a general chemical potential equilibrium equation $μ_n=μ_p+Cμ_e$ is obtained to describe the steady equilibrium at high temperatures ($T>10^9$K). An analytic fitting formula of coefficient $C$ is presented for the sake of simplicity as the neutrino and antineutrino are transparent. It is a simple method to estimate the electron fraction for the steady equilibrium $npe^{\pm}$ gas that using the corresponding equilibrium condition. As an example, we apply this method to the GRB accretion disk and approve the composition in the inner region is approximate equilibrium as the accretion rate is low. For the case with external neutrino flux, we calculate the initial electron fraction of neutrino-driven wind from proto-neutron star model M15-l1-r1. The results show that the improved equilibrium condition makes the electron fraction decrease significantly than the case $μ_n=μ_p+μ_e$ when the time is less than 5 seconds post bounce, which may be useful for the r-process nucleosynthesis

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.