Paper detail

Steady-state accretion in magnetized protoplanetary disks

[abridged] We present a 1+1D global magnetically-driven disk accretion model that captures the essence of the MRI-driven accretion, without resorting to 3D global non-ideal MHD simulations. The gas dynamics is assumed to be solely controlled by the MRI and hydrodynamic instabilities. For given stellar and disk parameters, the Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity parameter $α$ is determined self-consistently under the framework of viscously-driven accretion from detailed considerations of the MRI with non-ideal MHD effects (Ohmic resistivity and ambipolar diffusion), accounting for disk heating by stellar irradiation, non-thermal sources of ionization, and dust effects on the ionization chemistry. Additionally, the magnetic field strength is constrained and adopted to maximize the MRI activity. We demonstrate the use of our framework by investigating steady-state MRI-driven accretion in a fiducial protoplanetary disk model around a solar-type star. We find that the equilibrium solution displays no pressure maximum at the dead zone outer edge, except if a sufficient amount of dust particles have accumulated there before the disk reaches a steady-state accretion regime. Furthermore, the steady-state accretion solution describes a disk that displays a spatially extended long-lived inner disk gas reservoir (the dead zone) accreting a few $10^{-9}\, M_{\odot}.\rm{yr}^{-1}$. By conducting a detailed parameter study, we find that the extend to which the MRI can drive efficient accretion is primarily determined by the total disk gas mass, the representative grain size, the vertically-integrated dust-to-gas mass ratio, and the stellar X-ray luminosity. A self-consistent time-dependent coupling between gas, dust, stellar evolution models and our general framework on million-year timescales is required to fully understand the formation of dead zones and their potential to trap dust particles.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.