Paper detail

Status of the Kazakov--Migdal Model

In this talk I discuss both the present status and some recent work on the Kazakov--Migdal Model which was originally proposed as a soluble, large $N$ realization of QCD. After a brief description of the model and a discussion of its solubility in the large $N$ limit I discuss several of the serious problems with the model which lead to the conclusion that it does {\it not} induce QCD. The model is nonetheless a very interesting example of a Gauge Theory and it is related to some very interesting Matrix Models. I then outline a technique \REF\dmsxyz{\dms}\refend which uses ``Loop Equations'' for solving such models. A Penner--like model is then discussed with two logarithmic singularities. This model is distinguished by the fact that it is exactly and explicitly soluble in spite of the fact that it is not Gaussian. It is shown how to analyze this model using both a technical approach and from a more physical point of view.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.