Paper detail

Status of Cosmological Parameters: Can $Ω=1$?

I discuss the Hubble parameter $H_0$, the age of the universe $t_0$, the density $Ω_0$, and the cosmological constant $Λ$. To focus the discussion, I concentrate on the issue of the value of the density $Ω_0$ in currently popular cosmological models in which most of the dark matter is cold, especially Cold + Hot Dark Matter (CHDM) and flat low- $Ω$ CDM with a Cosmological Constant ($Λ$CDM). The evidence would favor a small $Ω_0 \approx 0.3$ if (1) the Hubble parameter actually has the high value $h \approx 0.8$ favored by many observers, and the age of the universe $t_0 \geq 13$ Gy; or (2) the baryonic/total mass ratio in clusters is actually $\sim 20$\%, about 3-4 times larger than expected for standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in an $Ω=1$ universe, and standard BBN is actually right in predicting that the density of ordinary matter $Ω_b$ lies in the range $0.009 \leq Ω_b h^2 \leq 0.02$. The evidence would favor $Ω=1$ if (1) the POTENT analysis of galaxy peculiar velocity data is right, in particular regarding outflows from voids or the inability to obtain the present-epoch non-Gaussian density distribution from Gaussian initial fluctuations in a low-$Ω$ universe; or (2) the preliminary report from LSND indicating a neutrino mass $\geq 2.4$ eV is right, since that would be too much hot dark matter to allow significant structure formation in a low-$Ω$ $Λ$CDM model. Statistics on gravitational lensing of quasars provide a strong upper limit on $Λ$. Reliable data on all of these issues is becoming available so rapidly today that a clear decision between these alternatives may be possible within the next few years.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.