Paper detail

Statistics of the Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta regularization model for fluid turbulence

We explore one-point and two-point statistics of the Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta regularization model at moderate Reynolds number in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The results are compared to the limit cases of the Navier-Stokes-alpha model and the Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta model without subgrid-scale stress, as well as with high resolution direct numerical simulation. After reviewing spectra of different energy norms of the Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta model, the Navier-Stokes-alpha model, and Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta model without subrid-scale stress, we present probability density functions and normalized probability density functions of the filtered and unfiltered velocity increments along with longitudinal velocity structure functions of the regularization models and direct numerical simulation results. We highlight differences in the statistical properties of the unfiltered and filtered velocity fields entering the governing equations of the Navier-Stokes-alpha and Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta models and discuss the usability of both velocity fields for realistic flow predictions. The influence of the modified viscous term in the Navier-Stokes-alpha-beta model is studied through comparison to the case where the underlying subgrid-scale stress tensor is neglected. The filtered velocity field is found to have physically more viable probability density functions and structure functions for the approximation of direct numerical simulation results, whereas the unfiltered velocity field is found to have flatness factors close to direct numerical simulation results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.