Paper detail

Statistics of N-Body Simulations. II. Equal Masses after Core Collapse

This paper presents and analyses statistical results from a large number of $N$-body simulations of isolated systems with equal masses, in which $250\le N\le 2000$. It concentrates on the phase starting around the end of core collapse, when binaries start to play a crucial role. Interactions of hard binaries are consistent with the Spitzer (1987) cross section. The evolution of the half-mass radius after core collapse nearly follows classical theory, The evolution of the inner parts of the system around the time of core bounce is consistent with these simplified models provided that the continuous production of energy, as usually assumed, is replaced by a model of {\sl stochastic} energy production. Similarly, post-collapse evolution of the core requires a modest recalibration of the coefficient of energy generation, especially for small $N$. The distributions of velocity dispersion and anisotropy become remarkably homologous soon after core bounce. The bound mass of the systems very nearly follows a power law with time. A small number of escapers, presumed to be those associated with binary activity, dominate the energy which is carried off. The ``internal" energy of escaping binaries is consistent with theoretical expectations.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.