Paper detail

Statistics of mass substructure from strong gravitational lensing: quantifying the mass fraction and mass function

A Bayesian statistical formalism is developed to quantify the level at which the mass function slope (alpha) and the projected cumulative mass fraction (f) of (CDM) substructure in strong gravitational-lens galaxies, with arcs or Einstein rings, can be recovered as function of the lens-survey parameters and the detection threshold of the substructure mass. The method is applied to different sets of mock data to explore a range of observational limits: (i) the number of lens galaxies in the survey, (ii) the mass threshold, Mlow, for the detection of substructures and (iii) the uncertainty of the measured substructure masses. We explore two different priors on the mass function slope: a uniform prior and a Gaussian prior with alpha = 1.90+-0.1. With a substructure detection threshold Mlow=3x10^8 Msun, the number of lenses available now (n_l=30), a true dark-matter mass fraction in (CDM) substructure <=1.0% and a prior of alpha = 1.90+-0.1, we find that the upper limit of f can be constrained down to a level <=1.0% (95% CL). In the case of a Gaussian prior on alpha, it is always possible to set stringent constraints on both parameters. We also find that lowering the detection threshold has the largest impact on the ability to recover alpha, because of the (expected) steep mass-function slope. In the future, thanks to new surveys with telescopes, such as SKA, LSST and JDEM and follow-up telescopes with high-fidelity data, a significant increase in the number of known lenses will allow us to recover the satellite population in its completeness. For example, a sample of 200 lenses, equivalent in data-quality to the Sloan Lens ACS Survey and a detection threshold of 10^8 Msun, allows one to determine f=0.5+-0.1% (68% CL) and alpha=1.90+-0.2 (68% CL).

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.