Paper detail

Statistics of interacting galaxies at z~0.7

We present the results of our analysis of the frequencies of galaxies with tidal tails and M51-type galaxies in several deep fields of the Hubble Space Telescope (HDF-N, HDF-S, HUDF, GOODS, GEMS). In total, we have found about seven hundred interacting galaxies at redshifts z<1.5 in these fields. At z<0.7, the observed space densities of galaxies with tidal structures and M51-type galaxies have been found to increase as $\propto (1+z)^m$, where m~2.6. According to our estimates, over the last 6-7 Gyr, i.e., at z<0.7, about a third of the galaxies with M(B)<-18 mag must have undergone strong gravitational perturbations and mergers and ~1/10-1/5 of the galaxies have accreted relatively low-mass nearby satellites typical of M51-type galaxies. The possible decrease in the timescale on which a distant galaxy appears peculiar with growing z can increase considerably the estimated rate of mergers.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.