Paper detail

Statistics of extreme objects in the Juropa Hubble Volume simulation

We present the first results from the JUropa huBbLE volumE (Jubilee) project, based a large N-body, dark matter-only cosmological simulation with a volume of $V=(6 h^{-1}\mathrm{Gpc})^3$, containing 6000$^3$ particles, performed within the concordance $Λ$CDM cosmological model. The simulation volume is sufficient to probe extremely large length scales in the universe, whilst at the same time the particle count is high enough so that dark matter haloes down to $1.5\times10^{12} h^{-1}\mathrm{M}_\odot$ can be resolved. At $z = 0$ we identify over 400 million haloes. The cluster mass function is derived using three different halofinders and compared to fitting functions in the literature. The distribution of clusters of maximal mass across redshifts agrees well with predicted masses of extreme objects, and we explicitly confirm that the Poisson distribution is very good at describing the distribution of rare clusters. The Poisson distribution also matches well the level to which cosmic variance can be expected to affect number counts of high mass clusters. We find that objects like the Bullet cluster exist in the far-tail of the distribution of mergers in terms of relative collisional speed. We also derive the number counts of voids in the simulation box for $z = 0$, $0.5$ and $1$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.