Paper detail

Statistics and implications of substructure detected in a representative sample of X-ray clusters

We present a morphological study of 35 X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at 0.15<z<0.3, selected in a similar manner to the Local Cluster Substructure Survey (LoCuSS), for which deep XMM-Newton observations are available. We characterise the structure of the X-ray surface brightness distribution of each cluster by measuring both their power ratios and centroid shift, and thus rank the clusters by the degree of substructure. These complementary probes give a consistent description of the cluster morphologies with some well understood exceptions. We find a remarkably tight correlation of regular morphology with the occurrence of cool cores in clusters. We also compare our measurements of X-ray morphology with measurements of the luminosity gap statistics and ellipticity of the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). We check how our new X-ray morphological analysis maps onto cluster scaling relations, finding that (i) clusters with relatively undisturbed X-ray morphologies are on average more luminous at fixed X-ray temperature than those with disturbed morphologies, and (ii) disturbed clusters have larger X-ray masses than regular clusters for a given temperature in the M-T relation. We also show that the scatter in the ratio of X-ray and weak lensing based cluster mass measurements is larger for disturbed clusters than for those of more regular morphology. Overall, our results demonstrate the feasibility of assembling a self-consistent picture of the physical structure of clusters from X-ray and optical data, and the potential to apply this in the measurement of cosmological cluster scaling relations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.