Paper detail

Statistically significant length scale of filaments as a robust measure of galaxy distribution

We have used a statistical technique "Shuffle" (Bhavsar & Ling 1988; Bharadwaj, Bhavsar & Sheth 2004) in seven nearly two dimensional strips from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Six (SDSS DR6) to test if the statistically significant length scale of filaments depends on luminosity, colour and morphology of galaxies. We find that although the average filamentarity depends on these galaxy properties, the statistically significant length scale of filaments does not depend on them. We compare it's measured values in SDSS against the predictions of Lambda CDM N-body simulations and find that Lambda CDM model is consistent with observations. The average filamentarity is known to be very sensitive to the bias parameter. Using Lambda CDM N-body simulations we simulate mock galaxy distributions for SDSS NGP equatorial strip for different biases and test if the statistically significant length scale of filaments depends on bias. We find that statistically significant length scale of filaments is nearly independent of bias. The average filamentarity is also known to be dependent on the galaxy number density and size of the samples. We use Lambda CDM dark matter N-body simulations to test if the statistically significant length scale of filaments depends on these factors and find a very weak dependence. Finally we test the reliability of our method by applying it to controlled samples of segment Cox process and find that our method successfully recovers the length of the inputted segments. Summarizing these results we conclude that the statistically significant length scale of filaments is a robust measure of the galaxy distribution.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.