Paper detail

Statistical tools for seed bank detection

In this article, we derive statistical tools to analyze and distinguish the patterns of genetic variability produced by classical and recent population genetic models related to seed banks. In particular, we are concerned with models described by the Kingman coalescent (K), models exhibiting so-called weak seed banks described by a time-changed Kingman coalescent (W), models with so-called strong seed bank described by the seed bank coalescent (S) and the classical two-island model by Wright, described by the structured coalescent (TI). As the presence of a (strong) seed bank should stratify a population, we expect it to produce a signal roughly comparable to the presence of population structure. We begin with a brief analysis of Wright's $F_{ST}$, which is a classical but crude measure for population structure, followed by a derivation of the expected site frequency spectrum (SFS) in the infinite sites model based on 'phase-type distribution calculus' as recently discussed by Hobolth et al. (2019). Both the $F_{ST}$ and the SFS can be readily computed under various population models, they discard statistical signal. Hence we also derive exact likelihoods for the full sampling probabilities, which can be achieved via recursions and a Monte Carlo scheme both in the infinite alleles and the infinite sites model. We employ a pseudo-marginal Metropolis-Hastings algorithm of Andrieu and Roberts (2009) to provide a method for simultaneous model selection and parameter inference under the so-called infinitely-many sites model, which is the most relevant in real applications. It turns out that this full likelihood method can reliably distinguish among the model classes (K, W), (S) and (TI) on the basis of simulated data even from moderate sample sizes. It is also possible to infer mutation rates, and in particular determine whether mutation is taking place in the (strong) seed bank.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.